As does Java, JScript's, JavaScript's Math.round method, XPath's round function, etc.
It's no wonder there was such a backlash about the Math.Round implementation. On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:24:58 -0400, Darrel Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Interestingly you will find that Microsoft SQL Server does not use Bankers >when rounding, which is why the .Net SqlDecimal.Round function also does not >use Bankers. > >Darrel > > >On 4/20/06, Peter Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Yep, searching for the banker's algorithm--especially with respect to >> Math.Round--leads into many different discussions/rants and other >> algorithms. Generally, I've found the discussions lead to "avoid >> Math.Round and implement your own". >> >> But, we don't have the ability of overriding how System.Drawing classes >> invoke Round, like Math.Round in .NET 2.0. >> >> Which is all well and good; if I have to roll-my-own Round (especially in >> general, if using .NET 1.x), then so be it. But, I would at least expect >> System.Drawing.*.Round() to be useful to someone, like Math.Round() (if >> only to bankers). I fail to see the usefulness of System.Drawing.*.Round >> (). =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
