Yes there is :) Quite a bit more in fact. The two methods are not really tied together. I'm trying to take an existing type (in the form of an object) and derive a "type" from it that can be passed to generic method.
I'm not sure it's possible, but it was worth asking. Thanks, Mike On 6/7/06, John Brett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I reverse the process and pass a type to a generic method when all I > have is a string? Do I want to ask the question - why are you going to such lengths to convert a string to a generic method, only to then induce the string from the generic parameter? Seems like a lot of effort to go around in a circle. Presumably there's more to this than meets the eMail? John =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
=================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
