I already said that and also said that if an application "suffers"
(mwuaha :) a performance hit from the very fact that it calls virtual
methods, it shouldn't be written for .NET.
On 7/8/06, Frans Bouma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anybody know why methods aren't virtual by default in .NET?
> It seems like a really bad default to have all methods non-virtual.
Performance. If you have a call chain of n method calls and all are
virtual, it will be slower than when you have a call
chain of n method calls and all are non-virtual.
FB
===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
--
Cheers,
Stoyan
===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
