Makes sense, DLL>LIB>linker seems like a value-less intermediary step to me.
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:23:05 -0400, J. Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >At 07:07 PM 7/19/2006, Peter Ritchie wrote (in part) > >> "(well, a LIB for DLL, maybe; but, it's better to just >> regenerate the LIB from the DLL with the latest librarian)." > >Believe it or not, the KB article I pointed to says that the "generate a LIB from the DLL" feature is not present in the latest VS tools! That's bizarre, if you ask me... =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
