Yes, Not many people can say that, and because kudos is a too much used word especially now, you have my hatsoff. ...and wishes I could experience what you have. I am now starting to know what sharing a project can even become like, and even if critical, I hope I never become unappreciative.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Provencher > Sent: 15 November 2006 01:16 AM > To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Data Structures in .Net? > > Well said! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Brooks > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 6:02 PM > To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Data Structures in .Net? > > I can't speak for COBOL per-se, but many years ago I worked on medical > lab software. Our product was written in PL/I (subset G, Digital > Research's compiler). It was a VERY extensive system with about 2 > million lines of PL/I and about 100K lines of x86 assembly (much of > both it written by me--and the TSRs and instrument handlers were in C > and x86 doing interrupt-driven stuff on the serial ports under > DesqView/OmniView). This application was based on Btrieve's record > manager and ran in a small-model DOS application (64K program, 64K > data) running over Novell Netware with _very extensive_ overlaying... > I am proud of what we could do... > > =================================== > This list is hosted by DevelopMentorR http://www.develop.com > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > http://discuss.develop.com =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
