>>Java old, .NET new, looky! we smarter and cheaper - I think these are >>very important messages to convey to the client.
> Yeah, but you know what they are going to say.... Why can't we handle data structures? So > in their mind, who's smarter? If COBOL can handle it, why not C# and VB? In the end, it's > all just MS ilCode. The obvious answer is "It can handle the COBOL way of data structures, but using COBOL as an INTERMEDIATE means allows us to complete the .NET transition a whole lot faster. That way at the end of the process we'll have a true .NET with no COBOL version to carry us into the 22nd century, but we'll also have a present WORKING .NET version until then". <html><body><center><hr><b><font face=arial size=2>Visit the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange's Website<a href=http://www.tase.co.il> www.tase.co.il</a></b></body></html> =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
