>> I think you might be thinking of the Profile system instead. You are correct, I was talking out of my backside. It was the profile I was thinking of. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 08:33:50 -0800> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: > [ADVANCED-DOTNET] AOP and security> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM> > > The membership *does not* read or write to the SQL database on each > request. You only call to the Membership system when a user logs-in. > Everything else is then handled via the FormsAuthentication system - which > does not access a database on any request (instead it uses a cookie to > authenticate the user). As such, you could have a thousand active users on > the site, and never hit the database on any request other than when they > login. This scales incredibly well, and works on both single-system and > web-farm configurations.> > The membership API also doesn't serialize any > objects to the database. I think you might be thinking of the Profile system > instead.> > Thanks,> > Scott> > -----Original Message-----> From: Discussion > of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cowan> > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 7:29 AM> To: > ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] AOP and > security> > Hi,> The membership reads and writes to SqlServer by default, it > also puts impositions as such things as all objects should be serializable.> > > THere obviously is an overhead involved in reading and writing to SqlServer > on every page request.> > >> (and in use on systems with 2M+ active users).> > > I am sure they have top of the range hardware which is not always the case > for my end of the market. We are running a reasonably busy website and the > client has not even given us a dedicated web server. We are also running > ASP.NET 2.0 on windows 2000 and IIS 5.0. We are trying to talk them into > upgrading but we they are being very stubborn.> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 07:05:27 -0800> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: > [ADVANCED-DOTNET] AOP and security> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM> > > The default providers in ASP.NET 2.0 are extremely fast and scalable (and > in use on systems with 2M+ active users).> > If you want to override the > providers and role your own (using whatever storage schema you want), then > you can also build and plug-in your own providers. This blog post points to a > few simple providers that are useful to get started: > http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2006/10/13/Tip_2F00_Trick_3A00_-Source_2F00_Documentation-for-Simple-ASP.NET-2.0-SQL-Providers-Published.aspx> > > Thanks,> > Scott> > -----Original Message-----> From: Discussion of > advanced .NET topics. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cowan> > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 1:43 AM> To: > ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] AOP and > security> > I am not for one minute suggesting you can serve web.config > files. you are aware connection strings have been hacked from the > web.config?> > I just do not like the overhead of the members/roles stuff > that comes with .NET 2.0. I had a look at membership and found it very slow.> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:17:58 -0500> From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [> ===================================> This > list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com> > View archives > and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com> > > ===================================> This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® > http://www.develop.com> > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > http://discuss.develop.com =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
