> I think the Cecil project from Mono would be useful for AOP and most
> dynamic stuff.
>
> http://www.mono-project.com/Cecil
>
> "Cecil is a library written by Jb Evain to generate and inspect
> programs and libraries in the ECMA CIL format.
>
> In simple English, with Cecil, you can load existing managed
> assemblies, browse all the contained types, modify them on the fly and
> save back to the disk the modified assembly.
>
> Today it is used by the Mono Debugger by the bug-finding and
> compliance checking tool Gendarme as well as DB4O."
Checking more on additional tools WITH docs, I ran into postsharp:
http://www.postsharp.org/
Seems pretty ok, and has docs :)
FB
>
> Sébastien
>
> On 2/26/07, Krebs Kristofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Isn't the main reason for making methods non-virtual by default supposed
> > to prevent unanticipated overrides? When authoring a class that others
> > are supposed to derive from you have to be strategic about which methods
> > are to be overridable or else you can get versioning and other problems.
> > Especially if it is black-boxed. In my experience virtual methods should
> > basically be empty to avoid the problem with "should/must I call the
> > base implementation or not, do I call it before or after my code etc".
> >
> > // Kristofer
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frans Bouma
> > Sent: den 26 februari 2007 09:45
> > To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
> > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Virtual methods in .NET - was
> > Implementing an Interface - C# vs. VB.NET
> >
> > > As I said the profiling API is not an optimal way of doing things (in
> > > particulaer because there is no good way of updating symbols on the
> > > fly). Doing a byte coe weave (link time) one can quite easily update
> > > symbols for ven code.
> >
> > Ok, I then misinterpreted your post, I thought you prefered the
> > profiler api to do things.
> >
> > > My statement that it offers more hope is contingent upon a mechanism
> > > to update symbols, ifthis existed it would really offer the best
> > > ofboth worlds.
> >
> > fully agreed.
> >
> > About SSCLI modified tools: these can be helpful, but it should
> > be
> > doable with standard MS shipped .NET code/compilers, as most
> > organisations
> > won't trust a '3rd party compiler' I think.
> >
> > FB
> >
> > ===================================
> > This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com
> >
> > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> > http://discuss.develop.com
> >
> > ===================================
> > This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com
> >
> > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
> >
>
>
> --
> Sébastien
> www.sebastienlorion.com
===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor� http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
