> I think the Cecil project from Mono would be useful for AOP and most > dynamic stuff. > > http://www.mono-project.com/Cecil > > "Cecil is a library written by Jb Evain to generate and inspect > programs and libraries in the ECMA CIL format. > > In simple English, with Cecil, you can load existing managed > assemblies, browse all the contained types, modify them on the fly and > save back to the disk the modified assembly. > > Today it is used by the Mono Debugger by the bug-finding and > compliance checking tool Gendarme as well as DB4O."
Checking more on additional tools WITH docs, I ran into postsharp: http://www.postsharp.org/ Seems pretty ok, and has docs :) FB > > Sébastien > > On 2/26/07, Krebs Kristofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Isn't the main reason for making methods non-virtual by default supposed > > to prevent unanticipated overrides? When authoring a class that others > > are supposed to derive from you have to be strategic about which methods > > are to be overridable or else you can get versioning and other problems. > > Especially if it is black-boxed. In my experience virtual methods should > > basically be empty to avoid the problem with "should/must I call the > > base implementation or not, do I call it before or after my code etc". > > > > // Kristofer > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frans Bouma > > Sent: den 26 februari 2007 09:45 > > To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM > > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Virtual methods in .NET - was > > Implementing an Interface - C# vs. VB.NET > > > > > As I said the profiling API is not an optimal way of doing things (in > > > particulaer because there is no good way of updating symbols on the > > > fly). Doing a byte coe weave (link time) one can quite easily update > > > symbols for ven code. > > > > Ok, I then misinterpreted your post, I thought you prefered the > > profiler api to do things. > > > > > My statement that it offers more hope is contingent upon a mechanism > > > to update symbols, ifthis existed it would really offer the best > > > ofboth worlds. > > > > fully agreed. > > > > About SSCLI modified tools: these can be helpful, but it should > > be > > doable with standard MS shipped .NET code/compilers, as most > > organisations > > won't trust a '3rd party compiler' I think. > > > > FB > > > > =================================== > > This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com > > > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > > http://discuss.develop.com > > > > =================================== > > This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com > > > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com > > > > > -- > Sébastien > www.sebastienlorion.com =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor� http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com