Generics might be of help here since it has the default keyword.... On 10/29/07, David Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Of course as soon as I start this I realise that the problem has shifted > from testing a result to setting the non default value. I'm unlikely to do > that bit and forget to do the rest, so I guess there's nothing for it but > to be careful. > > Thanks > David. > > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 06:25:56 -0600, Steve Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >Use reflection to compare property values. If you have a mismatch, you > need > >to fix your clone method. > > > > > >-- > >Steve Johnson > > > >On 10/29/07, David Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> I have some classes where I provide a Clone() method to provide a deep > >> copy of an instance, and would like to test that I haven't added a > member > >> to the class without also adding it to Clone(). > >> > >> To test Clone() I set a non-default value for the member, then check > that > >> the cloned copy has that value. However if I forget to add it to Clone > (), > >> I'll probably also forget to add it to the test. > >> > >> Does anyone have a way to do this, other than the obvious one of being > >> more disciplined? > >> > >> Thanks > >> David. > > =================================== > This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(R) http://www.develop.com > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > http://discuss.develop.com >
=================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
