You should look at the endless conversation around this at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/altdotnet/message/2774
On 2/28/08, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > See http://google.com/search?q=NIH+syndrome :P > > It probably had to do with legal issues or the desire to NOT pick a > favorite. However I don't work for microsoft and IANAL, so take my > explanation with a grain of salt. I did say probably, didn't I? ;) > > Also, it may have been created to help illustrate the flexibility of > the mvc fx. I expect there will be online tutorials covering [insert > your favorite IOC implementation here] aplenty. Just say'n. > > > -- > -Christopher > | AspInsider > http://bluefenix.net > > > On Feb 28, 2008, at 1:52 AM, Paul Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Can somebody tell me why Microsoft have gone to the trouble of > > releasing another IOC implementation? > > > > I am talking about Unity.We already have at least 3 very stable and > > very good ioc implementations. That is Castle Windsor (my > > favourite), spring and structure map.Why have they bothered? They > > will just be playing catch up on the others. > > > > Don't even start me on the entity framework compared to Nhibernate > > etc. > > > > It really depresses [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Who's friends with who and co-starred in what? > > http://www.searchgamesbox.com/celebrityseparation.shtml > > =================================== > > This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(R) http://www.develop.com > > > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > http://discuss.develop.com > > =================================== > This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(R) http://www.develop.com > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > http://discuss.develop.com > =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
