At 08:32 PM 3/9/2001 +0100, Perico wrote:
>I have to avoid this wrong behaviour. I've tried to define the method
>as synchronized, but this doesn't work since the two calls are executing
>(simultaneously!!!) in the same thread, so no mutual exclusion is
>guaranteed with synchronized (this modifier only guarantees mutual
>exclusion between different threads -anyway, I couldn't imagine before a
>thread executing twice the same method at the same time-).
>
>I hope you can help me, because I have to solve this problem and I don't
>even understand what is happen.
Everyone, please send questions to only one of [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Most of us subscribe to both anyway,
making such messages redundant. Much thanks.
Perico, I sent an answer on the above to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I hope it
helps.
_______________________________________________
Advanced-swing mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://eos.dk/mailman/listinfo/advanced-swing
