On 28/09/2008 06:15, Matt Ingenthron wrote: > What I always find funny about these articles is they're arguing > OpenSolaris/Solaris is irrelevant (as stated in the subheading) or > dying. If that's the case, why go make the argument in the press? It'd > not be worth discussing if it were true, right? >
That's pretty much what Stephen at Redmonk said (in part) the last time this all came up: http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/02/20/linux-vs-opensolarisagain-the-qa/ Jim -- http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris/
