>> On Thu, 9 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >(James Joyce on the other hand is just plain obfuscated !!).
>>
>> I know this wasn't serious, but--I disagree.
I'm glad for the disclaimer.
>> I can't give convincing
>> reasons (maybe in a few years), but one thing I know is that a writer
>> of that stature "obfuscates" only for very good reasons.
True, sometimes obfuscation has a point - that's the difference between art and
engineering.
How about if I drop the word "just" above ?? Fair ?
>> This is relevant to the discussion in a way I can't explain...
Well, it's leading gently away from PerlAdvocacy, but towards a very interesting
other area - introspection about what we do and how, which can lead back to the
tools we use, and how we express ourselves (but then you've read my previous
rambling post).
Hey - what happened to that slashperl site that someone suggested last week !!
I'll help out with the code...
Tim
_________________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this message is intended for the addressee
only and may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the addressee, please delete this message and notify the
sender; you should not copy or distribute this message or disclose its
contents to anyone.
Any views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of WestLB or any of its affiliates.
No reliance may be placed on this message without written confirmation
from an authorised representative of its contents.
