Johan Vromans [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth: *> *>deliberate goals, think before you code etc.. If a language is *>sufficiently powerful there is a risk of losing track. You can buy a *>chainsaw everywhere, but if you do not know how to use it on the tree *>in front of your house, you risk the tree falling on the house *>instead. It really does not matter whether the chainsaw is electric or *>runs on liquid fuel. sh, awk, python, etc...all of these can be powerful languages but why does Perl in particular have this stigma of being complex, difficult to maintain and obfuscated? I'm not asking about the reality...rather the perception. It's not just the PHB's who have this perception. e.
- RE: Thoughts on maintaining perl Horsley Tom
- Re: Thoughts on maintaining perl Tom Christiansen
- RE: Thoughts on maintaining perl Chris Nandor
- Re: Thoughts on maintaining perl Steve Lane
- Re: Thoughts on maintaining perl Ben_Tilly
- Re: Thoughts on maintaining perl Simon Cozens
- Re: Thoughts on maintaining perl Chris Nandor
- RE: Thoughts on maintaining perl Horsley Tom
- Re: Thoughts on maintaining perl Tom Christiansen
- Re: Thoughts on maintaining perl Johan Vromans
- Re: Thoughts on maintaining perl Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Thoughts on maintaining perl Peter Scott
- Re: Thoughts on maintaining perl Kurt D. Starsinic
- Re: Thoughts on maintaining perl David H. Adler
- Re: Thoughts on maintaining perl Ben_Tilly
- Re: Thoughts on maintaining perl Tom Christiansen
- Re: Thoughts on maintaining perl Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Thoughts on maintaining perl Chris Nandor
- RE: Thoughts on maintaining perl Tzadik and Sheva Vanderhoof
- Re: Thoughts on maintaining perl Adam Turoff
- Re: Thoughts on maintaining perl Matt Sergeant