On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 08:49:45PM -0500, John Adams wrote: > On May 12, 2006, at 3:45 PM, Nathan Torkington wrote: > > >On 13/05/2006, at 2:17 AM, Peter Scott wrote: > >>I don't know how long it's been up, but I just noticed Google Trends. > >> See > >>http://www.google.com/trends?q=perl > > > >For a bad time, compare Perl to its peers: > ><http://www.google.com/trends? > >q=perl+programming%2Cpython+programming%2Cruby+programming&ctab=0&geo=a > >ll&date=all> > > For a brief period in 2005, all three were just noise: > <http://www.google.com/trends? > q=perl+programming%2Cpython+programming%2Cruby+programming%2C+shell+prog > ramming&ctab=2&geo=all&date=all>
I don't know what these trends means either. But it does seem like a waste to send graphs around without any indication as to what the lines mean. Really, the url's would have been sufficient. Walt
