Thank you for spending time to answer, Indeed the impl: is not in the original code, but I clearly specify in the first message that the job did pass validation… and removing "impl:" it doesn't change anything to the problem: same JavaBean-related exception ! (I would say "hopefully !", because both versions are strictly identical from an XML semantical point of view...)
And you miss to answer the point: why a validated job fails with a server side error at scheduling time ? + the original schedule_report.rb example doesn't even pass validation if you don't add xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' to the validateReportJob XML tag, so please don't tell me "don't modify our examples, they are so perfect…" (kidding) + before reading yout answer, I ended-up doing the job in Java, so the problem is not CPM-related, the same parameters set works fine from the Java reporting example. (the original schedule_report.rb report parameters set fails with the same message…) + after reading your answer, I also do the testing with the Ruby AdWord Gem, and it works… so the conclusion is: there is something in the way the SOAP request is built that is quite different between the schedule_report.rb and the report.rb using the Gem, … with some more time, I would investigate exactly what … but at first sight, due to the fact that I had to add a "xmlns" tag to the original example to pass validation, the problem may be related to the version of the REXML lib installed here… (…side effect modifying the way the SOAP request is built… ?) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AdWords API Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
