Hello Weston, As per our announcement blog post linked to above, "We plan to launch the core functionality of API v2009 on our production servers in about 2 months, with the remaining functionality needed for AdWords parity released over the following 3 months." "Core functionality" refers to what's currently available in the v2009 Sandbox. The "remaining functionality" includes services like the equivalent of the KeywordToolService. Those timelines are as specific as I could get right now.
Cheers, -Jeff Posnick, AdWords API Team On May 18, 1:38 pm, Weston Weems <[email protected]> wrote: > Wow. > > Seems like about the worst way you could migrate libraries, trying to > roll out a new version and telling people to intermingle calls to the > old api with the new. > > Any ball park idea of when Keyword tool will make it into the 2009 > api? After the 2009 api goes live? > > Weston > > On May 14, 3:24 pm, AdWords API Advisor <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hello Weston, > > > Hopefully the client libraries, which we released today, will > > simplify things a bit for you: > > > http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com/2009/05/client-library-updates-part-1.... > > > To answer your specific questions, v200902 is only live in the shared > > Sandbox environment right now. It can't be used to access the > > Production environment. > > > As mentioned in the announcement blog post > > > http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com/2009/04/hello-all-as-we-mentioned-in-o... > > > there are a number of v13 services that are not yet implemented in > > v200902. The KeywordToolService is one of those. We expect that there > > will be a period of time in which developers needs to mix and match > > v13 and v200902, for instance by using v200902's AdGroupCriterion > > service and v13's KeywordToolService. The client libraries were > > designed with this in mind, though again, you won't be doing this > > until v200902 is available in Production. > > > There's not a great deal of variety or expressiveness in the SOAP > > faults you get back from v200902 at the moment. I expect that will > > change before the Production release. I'm not 100% sure on the .NET > > types, but yes, you should do the equivalent of catching a generic > > SoapException object if you're writing v200902 code for the time > > being. > > > Cheers, > > -Jeff Posnick, AdWords API Team > > > On May 14, 11:17 am, Weston Weems <[email protected]> wrote:> Ok, > > > > If it was April 1st, I think I'd have my answer... but its not, so I > > > dont =) > > > > Right now our little communication layer is set up for v13, and I want > > > to start evaluating v200902 for use, but its a major major change. Has > > > anyone delved into this yet? I've got a questions... > > > 1) Is this thing live? Eg, if I wanted to migrate everything to it > > > today, could I do so? Or is this just a testing environment with > > > actual deployment to come. > > > > 2) Ehh, where did keyword service go? > > > > 3) Error handling, should I catch soap exceptions in c# with a try{} > > > catch(SoapException se), or will we have better error handling > > > mechanisms? > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AdWords API Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
