Thanks again for the help. On Monday, 5 March 2012 11:56:25 UTC-5, Kevin Winter wrote: > > Hi, > Yes, we recommend this approach for all paging scenarios. We've since > updated out code examples to do this as well: > http://code.google.com/p/google-api-ads-python/source/browse/trunk/examples/adspygoogle/adwords/v201109/targeting/get_campaign_targeting_criteria.py#75 > > - Kevin Winter > AdWords API Team > > On Monday, March 5, 2012 11:21:06 AM UTC-5, David Bonner wrote: >> >> Thanks for the response, Kevin. >> >> I'd like to avoid special-casing my paging logic for this particular >> service, if i can...is that logic safe to use elsewhere? I'd been a bit >> more paranoid, and only been incrementing by the length of returned data. >> >
-- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AdWords API Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
