Kevin,
Sorry to hijack this thread, but the same problem exists with both wsdl.exe 
and svcutil.exe for this class generation from the provided wsdl. 
TargetingService class is not generated and the TargetingIdeaPage 
references unwrapped definition.  
As pointed out the TargetingIdeaPage generates:

<System.CodeDom.Compiler.GeneratedCodeAttribute("svcutil", "3.0.4506.648"), 
 _
     System.SerializableAttribute(),  _
     System.Diagnostics.DebuggerStepThroughAttribute(),  _
     System.ComponentModel.DesignerCategoryAttribute("code"),  _
    
 
System.Xml.Serialization.XmlTypeAttribute([Namespace]:="https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/o/v201109";)>
 
 _
    Partial Public Class TargetingIdeaPage
        
        Private totalNumEntriesField As Integer
        
        Private totalNumEntriesFieldSpecified As Boolean
        
        Private entriesField()() As Type_AttributeMapEntry
        
        '''<remarks/>
        <System.Xml.Serialization.XmlElementAttribute(Order:=0)>  _
        Public Property totalNumEntries() As Integer
            Get
                Return Me.totalNumEntriesField
            End Get
            Set
                Me.totalNumEntriesField = value
            End Set
        End Property
        
        '''<remarks/>
        <System.Xml.Serialization.XmlIgnoreAttribute()>  _
        Public Property totalNumEntriesSpecified() As Boolean
            Get
                Return Me.totalNumEntriesFieldSpecified
            End Get
            Set
                Me.totalNumEntriesFieldSpecified = value
            End Set
        End Property
        
        '''<remarks/>
        <System.Xml.Serialization.XmlArrayAttribute(Order:=1),  _
         System.Xml.Serialization.XmlArrayItemAttribute("data", 
GetType(Type_AttributeMapEntry), IsNullable:=false)>  _
        Public Property entries() As Type_AttributeMapEntry()()
            Get
                Return Me.entriesField
            End Get
            Set
                Me.entriesField = value
            End Set
        End Property
    End Class
    

Rather than:

    <System.CodeDom.Compiler.GeneratedCodeAttribute("wsdl", 
"2.0.50727.1432")> _
    <System.SerializableAttribute()> _
    <System.Diagnostics.DebuggerStepThroughAttribute()> _
    <System.ComponentModel.DesignerCategoryAttribute("code")> _
    
<System.Xml.Serialization.XmlTypeAttribute([Namespace]:="https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/o/v201109";)>
 
_
    Partial Public Class TargetingIdeaPage
        Private totalNumEntriesField As Integer

        Private totalNumEntriesFieldSpecified As Boolean

        Private entriesField As TargetingIdea()

        Public Property totalNumEntries() As Integer
            Get
                Return Me.totalNumEntriesField
            End Get
            Set(ByVal value As Integer)
                Me.totalNumEntriesField = value
                Me.totalNumEntriesSpecified = True
            End Set
        End Property

        <System.Xml.Serialization.XmlIgnoreAttribute()> _
        <EditorBrowsable(EditorBrowsableState.Never)> _
        Public Property totalNumEntriesSpecified() As Boolean
            Get
                Return Me.totalNumEntriesFieldSpecified
            End Get
            Set(ByVal value As Boolean)
                Me.totalNumEntriesFieldSpecified = value
            End Set
        End Property

        <System.Xml.Serialization.XmlElementAttribute("entries")> _
        Public Property entries() As TargetingIdea()
            Get
                Return Me.entriesField
            End Get
            Set(ByVal value As TargetingIdea())
                Me.entriesField = value
            End Set
        End Property
    End Class

I manually edit my class output to correct this, but it can be a tough one 
to debug for the newbies.  Can you pass along to the web services team to 
see if there is a solution for upcoming releases?

David  

On Tuesday, December 27, 2011 5:14:08 PM UTC-5, Kevin Winter wrote:
>
> Hi Maxim,
>   One of the previous maintainers of the current java library mentioned 
> that there's a flag for WSDL2JAVA and you need to tell it to generate 
> "all", all="true" for the ant task, --all for command line.
>
> - Kevin Winter
>
> On Tuesday, December 27, 2011 1:22:22 PM UTC-5, Maxim wrote:
>>
>> We are still on v201008 and I'm building v201109 client. 
>> Sounds like an axis config problem. I'm on a skiing trip at the 
>> moment, but I'll try different settings. Thanks for your help. 
>>
>
On Tuesday, December 27, 2011 5:14:08 PM UTC-5, Kevin Winter wrote:
>
> Hi Maxim,
>   One of the previous maintainers of the current java library mentioned 
> that there's a flag for WSDL2JAVA and you need to tell it to generate 
> "all", all="true" for the ant task, --all for command line.
>
> - Kevin Winter
>
> On Tuesday, December 27, 2011 1:22:22 PM UTC-5, Maxim wrote:
>>
>> We are still on v201008 and I'm building v201109 client. 
>> Sounds like an axis config problem. I'm on a skiing trip at the 
>> moment, but I'll try different settings. Thanks for your help. 
>>
>
On Tuesday, December 27, 2011 5:14:08 PM UTC-5, Kevin Winter wrote:
>
> Hi Maxim,
>   One of the previous maintainers of the current java library mentioned 
> that there's a flag for WSDL2JAVA and you need to tell it to generate 
> "all", all="true" for the ant task, --all for command line.
>
> - Kevin Winter
>
> On Tuesday, December 27, 2011 1:22:22 PM UTC-5, Maxim wrote:
>>
>> We are still on v201008 and I'm building v201109 client. 
>> Sounds like an axis config problem. I'm on a skiing trip at the 
>> moment, but I'll try different settings. Thanks for your help. 
>>
>
On Tuesday, December 27, 2011 5:14:08 PM UTC-5, Kevin Winter wrote:
>
> Hi Maxim,
>   One of the previous maintainers of the current java library mentioned 
> that there's a flag for WSDL2JAVA and you need to tell it to generate 
> "all", all="true" for the ant task, --all for command line.
>
> - Kevin Winter
>
> On Tuesday, December 27, 2011 1:22:22 PM UTC-5, Maxim wrote:
>>
>> We are still on v201008 and I'm building v201109 client. 
>> Sounds like an axis config problem. I'm on a skiing trip at the 
>> moment, but I'll try different settings. Thanks for your help. 
>>
>

-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "AdWords API Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en

Reply via email to