Hi Manuel, I'm not aware of any delays in the reporting system. If you have more technical information you can share please let us know.
Best, - Eric On Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:02:50 AM UTC-4, Manuel wrote: > > Hi Eric; > finally after a couple of weeks, i wanted to go live with our v201109 > migrated application since I thought that all basic API-features should be > stable in the meantime (including real-time reports). > Unfortunately just I experienced a delay of ~7 minutes with keyword > reports. > This is very sad and did not happen with v13 reports. > Is there anything I can do to help you solving this issue ? (log excerpts > etc.) > > Best, > Manuel > > > Am Montag, 12. März 2012 23:40:21 UTC+1 schrieb Eric Koleda: >> >> Hi Manuel, >> >> I don't have any updates, but I'm glad to know the problem is no longer >> affecting you. >> >> Best, >> - Eric >> >> On Monday, March 12, 2012 7:28:39 AM UTC-4, Manuel wrote: >>> >>> Hi Eric, >>> do you have an update ? When I tested a couple of days ago, the delay >>> seemed to be gone, but I'd like to have a confirmation about this issue. >>> >>> Thanks in advance, best >>> Manuel >>> >>> Am Montag, 27. Februar 2012 22:34:13 UTC+1 schrieb Eric Koleda: >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> The core engineering team has confirmed that some accounts may >>>> experience a small delay between changing keyword data and seeing the >>>> change in reports. The delay is in the order of minutes, and is leading >>>> to >>>> the differences you are seeing. They are working to eliminate this delay >>>> and I'll let you know when I have more information. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> - Eric >>>> >>>> On Friday, February 24, 2012 5:14:13 AM UTC-5, Manuel wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Michael, hi Eric, >>>>> I guess I'm experiencing the same issues with adhoc keyword >>>>> performance reports. >>>>> After adding and deleting several keywords via the API and retrieving >>>>> a new report afterwards, some of the deleted keywords still exist in the >>>>> report and vice versa, whereas UI results are up-to-date. >>>>> Since our application syncronizes an account's data with the report, >>>>> this behavior is crucial to us. >>>>> As a matter of fact, by trying to syncronize with deprecated data, our >>>>> application tries to delete already removed keywords, which will result >>>>> in >>>>> an API error >>>>> >>>>> EntityNotFound.INVALID_ID @ operations[0].operand.criterion.id; >>>>> trigger:\'*****\' >>>>> >>>>> I already found out, that statistical data (clicks, conversions etc.) >>>>> are updated in nightly cronjobs and are not presented in real-time. Does >>>>> this circumstance also apply to the overall "up-to-dateness" of the >>>>> keywords (without regarding statistical data). But that seems to be in >>>>> contrary to your statement, that the report-data reflects the UI-data. >>>>> >>>>> I'm really interested in the outcome of Michael's case, since that >>>>> seems to reflect the same issue. Please let me know, if I could help in >>>>> any >>>>> case. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Manuel >>>>> >>>>> PS: we did not experience those issues with the old v13 reporting >>>>> services... >>>> >>>> -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AdWords API Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
