Thanks Danial. I could pass the Adgroup IDs but again there could be thousands of them, so I'm not sure what the implications are.
Adding qualityinfo details to the keyword report is a GREAT idea and will be much appreciated! Oliver On Monday, October 1, 2012 9:55:01 AM UTC+1, AdWords API Advisor wrote: > > Hello Oliver, > > > In this case I'd recommend to use reports to get active AdGroups list and > use AdGroup's IDs in the predicate. > > It is very unlikely we'll introduce services coupling like this in near > future. I'll check if we can introduce qualityinfo details into the > reports instead. > > > -Danial, AdWords API Team. > > > Original Message Follows: > ------------------------ > From: Oliver <[email protected] <javascript:>> > Subject: Re: Can't specify an Adgroup Status selector on > AdGroupCriterionService. Stuck for a solution. > Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 06:34:21 -0700 (PDT) > > > Thanks Daniel. I can't use reports because I'm trying to get data that > is > > available only via the service objects (qualityinfo). > > > > I could just get back all keywords and only use the ones I know are in > > active adgroups. However, I'll be paying the API access rate to get > > keywords that I don't need. In an account with tens of thousands of > > keywords in deleted adgroups, this cost escalates quickly. > > > > I don't know what the implication would be (on the network traffic or > API > > call execution) of passing in the exact IDs of the keywords I want in > the > > selector field. There could be tens of thousands of them and I don't > want > > to pass such a huge amount of info in a http request. > > > > Where can I add this as a feature request for future releases? > > > > Oliver > > > > > > On Friday, September 28, 2012 10:36:11 AM UTC+1, Danial Klimkin wrote: > > > > > > Hello Oliver, > > > > > > > > > You can add columns for both AdGroup and Criteria to the Criteria > report: > > > > > > > https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/appendix/reports#criteria > > > > > > Setting filter on both AdGroupStatus and Status should return the > correct > > > data set for you. > > > > > > There is no way to achieve this with the AdGroupCriterion service > though. > > > > > > > > > -Danial, AdWords API Team. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, September 28, 2012 1:22:52 PM UTC+4, Oliver wrote: > > >> > > >> Thanks for the suggestion. We can do that, but that's a long and > slow > > >> way of achieving the result which I'd like to avoid if possible. It > would > > >> have been great if we could filter on the adgroup status if we can. > > >> > > >> Any other ideas from the pro users of the API or the API team? > > >> > > >> Oliver > > >> > > >> On Thursday, September 27, 2012 9:57:07 PM UTC+1, j.e.frank wrote: > > >>> > > >>> One idea is, you can first get the list of AdGroups that are Active, > > > >>> using the AdGroupService. Then build a list of the IDs of those ad > groups, > > >>> and use it in the selector of the keywords (along with the Status > predicate > > >>> that picks only active keywords). > > >>> > > >>> On Thursday, September 27, 2012 12:26:09 PM UTC-4, Oliver wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> We're trying to use the AdgroupCriterionService to get some > information > > >>>> about *active *keywords only. We're using the 'Status' selector > field > > >>>> to ensure only data for active keywords are returned. > > >>>> > > >>>> However, there are deleted Adgroups whose keywords are still in > > >>>> 'active' status. Adwords users typically just pause or delete an > adgroup > > >>>> without having to change the status of each keyword inside it. > > >>>> > > >>>> As you can guess, the issue we now have is we're getting back data > for > > >>>> these active keywords that are in the deleted adgroups! > > >>>> > > >>>> I can't see any selector field that we can use to filter by the > Adgroup > > >>>> status as well. > > >>>> > > >>>> Any ideas how we can get round this issue please? Is there any > other > > >>>> way we can target only the truly active keywords in the campaign? > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks in advance for any help with this. > > >>>> > > >>>> Oliver > > >>>> > > >>> > > > > -- > > =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ > > Also find us on our blog and discussion group: > > http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com > > http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api > > =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "AdWords API Forum" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] <javascript:> > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en > > -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AdWords API Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
