Hi! Thanks for the response!
Yeah, I'm aware of the fact that they're different metrics. We just used avg pos as an indicator of where's there's headroom in auctions and therefore where we might be able to make gains via more aggressive bids, however with it being sunsetted we're switching in a combination of impr share and the top/absolute top to indicate where we might be able to find headroom. We have few campaigns capped by budget so hopefully that would not cause those extra ones to come into effect. As you say we've tried to add in arbitrary values for the masked ones but that obviously didn't work. Just wasn't sure if other people might have been able to come up with a solution that we hadn't thought of! Thanks for the advice! We'll go away and look at the possibility of pulling the multiple reports - i'm not sure whether it's plausible across all of the accounts but we'll see! Thanks again! On Tuesday, 17 September 2019 10:47:43 UTC+1, Zweitze wrote: > > Well, you can't accurately aggregate those results. To do so, you would > need a replacement value for "<10%" and ">90%", and, whatever you do you > know you will be wrong. And even if you have none of such values I doubt > the numbers add up. For instance, on campaign level the number of missed > impressions because of insufficient campaign budget is included. It's > doubtful such numbers are also included on lower levels. But that is a > discussion to be held outside this forum, as it's not related to API. > > Anyway - the only solution is to download more reports, with different > settings. In our case, we also have results segmented by date, and > therefore we download aggregated by day, by month, and by quarter. Not nice > but there is no other way. Although requested, we decided NOT to download > per week or US-week, the latter goes from Sunday till Saturday. Sacrifices > are needed here. > In your case I suggest to download by keyword AND group AND campaign AND > account (four reports). And, if necessary, download these reports with and > without segments device and network, bringing you to sixteen reports per > account. > > > Further, you mentioned you are doing this because of the sunset of average > position. You should realize impression share is a different metric. > > > Hope this helps. > > > > > > On Tuesday, September 17, 2019 at 12:34:34 AM UTC+2, Jamie Tomkins wrote: >> >> We're trying to aggregate the data pulled from the keywords performance >> report up through the hierarchy - keyword>ad group>campaign>account (the >> data is also segmented by device and network). However we're having issues >> with the various imp. share values as the ">10%" results are making it >> impossible to aggregate upwards accurately. There are big discrepancies >> between our numbers and what we're seeing in the online interface >> >> We need some sort of view on this for internal reporting and are >> struggling to come up with a solution. Is anyone else looking at doing this >> with the sunsetting of avg pos/does anyone know any way around the issue? >> > -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AdWords API and Google Ads API Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AdWords API and Google Ads API Forum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/dcce7405-0c22-4f45-bdf7-8d5177538861%40googlegroups.com.
