Hi Mitchell, Thanks for the prompt reply. I am still a bit unclear about the implications of this.
If I pull a report by RegionCriteriaId, I am returned both Silicon Valley and San Francisco Bay Area *as well as *California. All of these locations have 'Region' status. Does the row for California *include *performance from one or both of the Silicon Valley and San Francisco Bay Area regions? In other words, if I want to see the performance of the United States by state, should I a) remove the rows with Silicon Valley and San Francisco Bay Area or b) add those rows to the California total? Which option will avoid double counting and align with the total United States performance? Regarding campaign targeting, your answer suggests that a campaign targeting California will, by inclusion, target Silicon Valley. However, any campaign currently targeting California will not be targeting the San Francisco Bay Area region. Is that correct? Would you call this a bug? -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AdWords API and Google Ads API Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AdWords API and Google Ads API Forum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/73a21a02-5fce-4a8f-bdb3-9f59d7fd7bf3%40googlegroups.com.
