On 22/08/2012, at 2:15 AM, Tomas Sedovic wrote: <snip> > ### Is Heat going to be the only way to launch deployments in Conductor or > will it be an optional part? ### > > We will need to see how stable and usable Heat is. How easy it is to deploy > and keep up (it would be another dependency, after all) and how much benefit > and code cleanup it brings to Aeolus.
From a Aeolus SysAdmins' point of view, at the moment there is a "Config Server" section in each Cloud Provider account for Audrey. i.e. place to add the Audrey https url, plus oauth info for it Are Heat's configuration concepts similar enough to Audrey that we could re-use the same Config Server section in the UI? Obviously with different code behind the scenes. Just wondering if it needs to be a user visible change. ;) + Justin -- Aeolus Community Manager http://www.aeolusproject.org
