On 11/13/2012 12:22 AM, Scott Seago wrote:
On 11/12/2012 02:08 PM, Hugh Brock wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:34:43PM +0100, Jaromír Coufal wrote:
On 12.11.2012 14:30, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
On 11/12/2012 02:23 PM, Scott Seago wrote:
On 11/12/2012 07:59 AM, Hugh Brock wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 01:54:43PM +0100, Jaromír Coufal wrote:
For this time, I would vote to move it 1h earlier. For upcoming
regular meetings we can try to find some other day, because I think
that Friday late afternoons wouldn't work very well for CZ
attendees.
-- Jarda
Yes, this is a good point. I've also been informed the RuPy
conference
in Brno conflicts with this.
If at all possible let's try to do the first meeting on Tuesday
(tomorrow) instead. I'll know my schedule better in a few
hours and will
mail the list accordingly.
--Hugh
Tuesday works for me too (as does Friday), but we'll need to schedule
around conductor sprint planning (which I think is 16:00 UTC/11:00
Eastern). Earlier should be fine, though.
Scott
Yup, Tuesday works for me too if it doesn't clash with the sprint
planning.
+1
(Winked Monkey call on Tuesday 17:00 UTC, so earlier time would work
better)
Well unfortunately I am in fact going to be on the road from this
evening through the end of Thursday, as it turns out, and Friday is out
b/c of the Brno RuPy thing.
Given this, can I ask that we do the kickoff meeting next Monday
November 19? 8:30 a.m. Eastern (1330 UTC) works for me if it's OK for
everyone else. I think we should plan on an hour with the idea that it
might be less time than that.
Proposed tech cabal members, let me know if this is a good time for you.
Works for me,
Scott
Take care,
--Hugh
Fine with me
