On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:23:53AM +0100, Martin Povolny wrote: > Making examples part of the release is surely a good idea. But in my > point of view we should make sure that we provide only working examples. > I think that broken examples are worse then no examples in this case. > > So I would see as a prerequisite having automated testing of these > examples a part of the (at least) release or even development process. > > Which brings me to the question whether we have support for putting > templates into conductor in the CLI. The answer is not yet. > > Then do we have the API to do it. Again the answer is no. So I would say > that we have to implement the API and the CLI and then provide the > examples with the release. > > -- > Martin Povolny <[email protected]> > tel. +420777714458
Great points, Martin. Would you mind updating the Release Cabal agenda to raise this issue on Thursday? (we can certainly talk about it before then, but let's address it in our meeting as well). Thanks, Steve|eggs
