On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 07:10:35AM -0500, Mo Morsi wrote: > On 12/17/2012 03:22 PM, Matt Wagner wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:44:54AM -0500, Mo Morsi wrote: > >> The following is the list of wiki pages grouped by their ultimate > >> destination. If there are any errors please reply here. I'll start the > >> migration process this week. > >> > >> Still need to figure out how to handle images and files that have been > >> uploaded and links to other wiki pages. > >> > >> -Mo > >> > >> ----------------------------- > >> > >> to site wiki: > > We never found a better place, though the website's wiki feels like an > > odd spot. I'd almost be up for just putting these on the Conductor wiki, > > since it's sort of been a de facto location for stuff that's > > cross-project. > > -1 this isn't the plan we agreed upon before I started working on this. > > We had explicitly wanted to split the content up, between the umbrella > (Aeolus), the all-in-one solution (conductor), and the other wikis. > > We had discussed alternatives to using the site wiki, but the only one > we came up with was using a mediawiki instance. We didn't want to do > this since the last mediawiki instance we instance was littered with > spam, though in retrospect I'm sure we could have found a way to deal w/ > that.
Ah, okay. I remember that discussion, though I forgot we decided to use the site wiki. In any event, I don't have a better suggestion. (It also looks like the Tech Cabal has been keeping notes there already, so there's a precedent for its use.) > I am willing to compromise. If anyone insists on not using the site > wiki, I'll do the export, generating tarballs with the content separated > in the manner I described below, and hand them off to whoever wants to > take it from there. > > > > > to other wikis: > > Building_Images_for_RHEL (imagefactory, oz) > > Development_Setup (imagefactory, oz) > > Image_Management_Engine (tim) > > Oz_template_description_language (oz) > > Not to complicate things, but some of these (such as the 'Building > > Images for RHEL' page) were things meant to be how-to guides for > > Conductor users, IIRC. It's interesting to me that there are only four > > pages that don't fall into the project-wide or Conductor categories so > > far -- it almost makes me wonder if we should just lump everything under > > one wiki. > > I'm fine w/ the first one being on the conductor wiki. > > > > >> excluding: (Most of these are feature pages, alot of these are done or > >> no > >> longer apply) > >> *Sprint* > > Is there historic value in these? > > Again the original plan was to _not_ delete anything off the old wiki, > just lock it down. Sorry, my memory must be going... > Everything being migrated and everything excluded will still be > available there in read-only mode. > > At some point in the far future (lets say 6 months from now) we can look > at whether or not we want to take redmine down for good. > > > > >> Adding_Caching_to_Conductor > >> Adding_Permission_Grant_list_to_UserGroup_Profile_UI > >> Add_Targeted_Reports_and_Statistical_Data > >> Adding_User_Groups > >> Aeolus-configure > >> Aeolus_vs_OpenStack > >> Aeolus_User_Stories > >> Aeolus_uninstall > >> Allow_Conductor_to_keep_a_history_of_deployment_activity > >> All_provider_config_to_reside_in_Conductor > >> Auto_Scaling > >> Background_Processing > >> Clearing_iwhd > > I was looking for this page just the other day, trying to help someone > > with a messed-up 1.0 install. I expect this is quite uncommon, but it > > kind of makes me wonder if there's more value than meets the eye in > > keeping some of these pages around. > > Same comment as above. Unless there is a specific reason not to exclude > it (eg 'we need xyz because ...') we can leave it on the old read-only > wiki until someone needs it (and then they can move it to wherever they > want themselves ;-) ). > > > > >> Using_the_Rails_console > > I'd put this together a while back to help less-technical people. I'm > > not sure anyone has used it in a while, though it may still have value. > > This is fine, will move this to the conductor wiki. > > >> V2 Conductor* > >> Wiki > > This appears to be the main page. Are we just going to rename it? > > There are actually many pages that contain this same content. Not really > sure why we have several copies. Odd... > > > > Thanks for putting this together, Mo. Seems like we had an awful lot of > > stuff on the wiki! > > Hence the mid-to-end of January timeline! ;-) (which now is seeming a > little tight in itself) > > -Mo Okay, sorry for my apparent memory lapses. I didn't mean to contradict what had already been decided, and I didn't realize the plan was to keep the old wiki read-only. That eliminates most of my concerns! -- Matt
