+1 Looking forward to all this being set in stone.
On 03/01/2013, at 10:11 PM, Angus Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > As discussed previously ( > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/aeolus-devel/2012-October/012923.html > ) there's a significant cost associated with the divergence of names between > Aeolus and Red Hat's Cloudforms. > > The Aeolus community loses out in several ways: > > - Users of Cloud Engine are using terminology which doesn't apply upstream, > putting a barrier between the Aeolus project and a good number of the users > of our software. > - As part of the productisation process, Red Hat translates all the strings > in Conductor into nine different languages.[1] If the use of terms could be > reconciled, Aeolus Conductor would immediately support nine languages, rather > than supporting one. > - The work required to maintain a separate set of terms for the Cloud Engine > product is tedious and error-prone and falls entirely on people who are key > contributors to Aeolus, and whose time could be better spent. > > Several rounds of shuttle diplomacy between the Aeolus community and Red > Hat's product managers are now complete, and we have arrived at a final set of > converged names. The final list is a significant set of changes from the > current set of names used in Cloudforms, in response to the feedback from the > Aeolus community. > > Here's the list, current names on the left, and the new name on the right: > > Image Template -> Component Outline > Deployable -> AppForm Blueprint > Deployment -> AppForm > Pool Family/Environment-> Cloud Environment > Pool -> Resource Zone > Provider -> Cloud Resource Provider > > Hardware Profile -> Hardware Profile > Provider Realm -> Provider Realm > Frontend Realm -> Frontend Realm > Image -> Image > Assembly -> Assembly > Instance -> Instance > Catalog -> Catalog > Config Server -> Config Server > > Please respond with +1 or objections. > > If you're new to the party, and are wondering if some of the new names could > be changed, the answer is, "Probably not, at this stage". It has taken > several rounds of discussion to get to this point. I'd strongly urge that we > accept these names wholesale. > > Of course, the applications will continue to evolve, and names may well > change in future, but we shouldn't miss this opportunity to reconcile the > Aeolus project's names with Cloudforms. > > Please note that, as discussed in the Brno dev converence, we need to use the > final set of names everywhere: > > - API > - CLI > - Controller names etc. > - Web UI > - Docs, Blogs, discussions > > So, there is going to be work to do to fix the entire application to use the > correct names. > > > > Angus > > >
