In a message dated 5/8/08 11:57:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> there should be a ten year moratorium on the use of the word 'aesthetic'. > I now propose extending that to include 'beauty' (and its cognates, and > 'ugly') . > I think you'll have even less luck than I will with 'real' and 'reality'. I tried to aid my case by offering substitute locutions that I believe can be used with no loss in conveying the notion one is entertaining, and with the benefit of reducing confusion. Any thoughts of comparably helpful substitutes for 'aesthetic(s)', 'beauty', and 'ugly'? They'd be much harder to replace, I suspect. ************** Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on family favorites at AOL Food. (http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001)
