It is interesting fact that I wrote my answer to Chris before I read
William's post.
Ability to create good stuff justifies everything.
Boris Shoshensky

-- William Conger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I won't answer for Boris but when Miller says I can't
justify beauty , I respnd by saying my work does that.
 Beauty can't be explained but it can be expressed.

WC


--- Chris Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Boris asks:
>
> "What  'modernism' you are talking about? This word
> is misused now-days
> as much as 'abstraction'."
>
>
> Boris, are there are any current
> writers/institutions that you would call
> modernist that address questions of why one should
> choose the
> "invigorating, encouraging, vital, comforting,
> wholesome and enjoyable" -- or
> the more basic questions of choosing good over evil
> or life over death ?
>
> Isn't  this exclusively the domain of traditional
> religions?
>
>
> So even if some modernists, like William, have an
> interest in something they
> call *beauty* --  they can't justify it (as
> modernists)  -- and if it does get
> cultivated within modernist institutions-- that
> cultivation is sporadic,
> accidental, and  generally ineffective.
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________
> Click to find moving companies, movers, van lines,
> and auto transport
> services. Low prices.
>
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/Ioyw6ijm4qQ2emwM89RDkazaH8BY2z
> R6GvrmL5Ehk5MElCklby2WoM/

_____________________________________________________________
Compete with the big boys.  Click here to find products to benefit your
business.
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2221/fc/Ioyw6i4t3HXycMNup0rSD2w4tRllND
7sORnjZSBPlMiJTJSDHsCC9G/?count=1234567890

Reply via email to