The idea that aesthetic experience from the work of art is ever impossible, because of historical or cultural conditions - absurd.
The Saul's statement:"...- my understanding is that aesthetics has to do with the quality of experience not art -", is absolutely correct. Boris Shoshensky -- Saul Ostrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: These are not aesthetic isues - but art historical and philosophical ones - the question of aesthetics are those of why does the ordering of certain information in a certain manner create invoke, or induce a stronger and perhaps more meaningful (pleasurable) self-reflective experience than another - as for Adorno - it seems that such experiences generated by works of art were no longer possible because of historical and cultural conditions - my understanding is that aesthetics has to do with the quality of experience not art - > From: Allan Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 15:43:13 +0900 > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: "...Aesthetics collapsed in 1970 under the weight of Theodor > Adorno's Aesthetic Theory." > > why > are art works art and some artists better than others, for two examples. ____________________________________________________________ Easy-to-use, advanced features, flexible phone systems. Click here for more info. http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/Ioyw6i4vdHuLxY3IslqEGX4gsBXcXq NeliseqyPIEurTxDtXPHdBOU/
