On 5 Aug 2008, at 21:43, Saul Ostrow wrote:
Further snippets of the main point in my initial email on this topic:
Please define
non-aesthetic objects
such as---
Oh, you wish me to make this case. I will settle with the distinction
that needs to be clarified, after all the point o clarification is the
one i was making, not the actuality of of how it is achieved;
achievement is not straightforward may I say.
I think your confusing value (quantitative) judgment and aesthetic
(qualitative) judgment
No, i am not that sort of convenient movement - and other variations
on value distinctions - is a part of the heart of the problem; to put
it another way it expresses the problems of aesthetics - and of other
practices in need of explanation, understanding.
Toodle-pip,
Allan.
PS, I really have no wish to discuss this issue off list, please post
replies to the list and not solely to me, or not to the list and me in
two emails. Thank you,.
