In a message dated 9/26/08 4:12:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> No -- no: His thoughts can't be perceived by you but they can be by him.
> It's strange use of 'exist' for you to say just because YOU can't perceive
> something, it doesn't exist.
> 
> And I don't think you should say, "Well, Boris's thoughts don't exist for
> ME." Suppose you meet Boris in a dark alley and he's carrying a hammer. 
> You'd
> be
> damned concerned about his thoughts -- which is to say you'd believe they
> exist even though, worst of luck, you can't perceive them at that 
> interesting
> moment.
> 

By what does he perceive his thoughts?

And if I meet someone in a dark alley and they   are carrying a hammer   they 
are also usually wearing something carpenterish. It is mostly guys in suits 
with hammers you have to worry about,particularly since hammers aren't really a 
good weapon of choice.
Kate sullivan


**************
Looking for simple solutions to your real-life 
financial challenges?  Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, 
tips and calculators.
      (http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001)

Reply via email to