Cheerskep,

The term Epistemic has been around for a very long time
(greek:episteme), especially in the philosophy of perception; and it is NOT a
synonym of conscious or consciousness. We have been discussing epistemic-non
epistemic for many years in Cambridge (Oxford). Of course, it does not mean it
is not an obsure term for most of the people.

My point is this:
You are not
conscious of all your sensations. 
In the process of perception (after
sensation) you can be conscious of a taste (apple juice); that mental state
could be conceptual (I identify it as apple juice), or non-conceptual (I
couldn't identify the taste).  Consciousness does not imply that the contents
of your mental states are conceptual; actually I believe most are
non-conceptual.

Your last paragraph is about conceptual mental states.

Sorry
I am short on time. In my new book on musical consciousness I tried to explain
all that.

Best

Luc

 www.lucdelannoy.com




----- Original Message ----
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 12:37:18 PM
Subject: "Epistemic", "conscious",
"aware of"

In a message dated 10/15/08 11:25:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:


Cheerskep,

How about "sensing AS non-epistemic", "perceiving AS
epistemic" instead of IS 
?

Luc

In truth, Luc, I myself would never use the
term 'epistemic'. As I've 
suggested in earlier postings, I thought I
discerned that you use 'epistemic' and 
'conscious' synonymously. If I'm right
about that, then your suggestion above is 
an expression of your notion that
that which is "perceived" is "conscious". 
That which is merely "sensed" is
not conscious. 

But then I admitted it's not serviceably clear to me what you
have in mind 
with "conscious" because your view is that we are not
"conscious" of sense data. 
>From closer examination, I inferred perhaps you
will call "conscious" only 
that notion which is the product of
post-sense-data processing; for example, 
"identifying" the sense data.  

I
myself balked at that idea as I understood it. I cited the example of when 
I
was once served apple juice in a champagne glass. I was beguiled by the
realization that the taste was extremely familar but I couldn't identify it. I
think of tastes and smells and shadowy visual figures and noises and pains as
sense data -- but they will often prompt the question, "What was that?" 

I
balked because, by saying such sensations were not "conscious", you seemed 
to
be saying -- to use a term I think of as synonymous with  "conscious" -- I
was not "aware of" them. I couldn't believe that could actually be your view.
So if I was misunderstanding you when you used familiar terms, 
I had no
chance of following the discussion with an obscure term like 
'epistemic' in
it. Since it appeared your notion of "epistemic" could be serviceably
summoned up by the more familiar term, 'conscious', I tried that.    

Your
explanation of "epistemic" -- "Sensorial process is non-epistemic in the
sense that it does not bring any knowledge per se, just "raw material", "bare
signs of the Real"; it is a non-conscious event."  -- didn't work for me.
(For one thing, I suspect I would also never use the term "knowledge per se".)
I take it you accept "identifying" the taste -- "Apple juice! -- as the
arrival of "knowledge per se", and therefore the "becoming conscious" of the
taste. 
But I'd claim I was vividly "aware of" the taste before I could
identify it.  
I couldn't believe you'd insist that before this moment I was
completely 
unaware of the taste -- but evidently you WOULD say I'm not
conscious of it. So 
maybe you'd say I am "aware of" it, but not "conscious
of" it. You're allowed 
to use words any way you want, but I strongly suspect
that when you use the 
word 'conscious' this way you will seldom convey to
others what you have in mind. 


I'm unsure what communicative use such a
notion of "epistemic/conscious" has. 
  

>From my distance, admittedly unsure
of what's running through your mind, it 
seems there's something not
thought-through here.    





**************
New MapQuest Local shows what's
happening at your destination.  
Dining, Movies, Events, News &amp; more. Try
it out 
(http://local.mapquest.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000002)

Reply via email to