Would there be a difference between the printed word to a painted
word on a canvas,
or the word , as uttered by some famed actor?
mando
On Oct 22, 2008, at 7:52 PM, armando baeza wrote:
If one thinks of words as art, can some form of aesthetics result?
And if that the case,what is the difference?
mando
On Oct 22, 2008, at 2:53 PM, William Conger wrote:
No, I think the problem will always be relevant. If meaning is
not in words, where is it? In "notions"? Notions are in
consciousness but they include feelings and feelings result from
bodily sensations. That means feelings are physical. If words
affect feelings then we assign meaning to them; that is, they
"occasion" a top-down structuring of experience.
Cheerskep says people communicating need to occasion similar,
serviceable, notions in each other's mind. So who has to do the
most work to get the mutually serviceable notions? Based on
Cheerskep's habit to claim all others are muddled and confused,
etc., in expressing their notions if he doesn't get it, I suppose
he is the judge. If he says I'm wrong or muddle-headed in saying
this, then does that mean he's more muddled than I am?
WC
--- On Wed, 10/22/08, armando baeza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: armando baeza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: "Synonyms"
To: [email protected]
Cc: "armando baeza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 3:25 PM
If any letter on the alphabet has it ,why not words?
mando
On Oct 22, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Chris Miller wrote:
Do any of the participants on this thread believe that
any new
ground has been
broken on this, the umpteenth discussion of
Cheerskep's insistence
that words
have no intrinsic meaning ?
Any new insights ?
_____________________________________________________________
Lower rates for Veterans. Click for VA loan
information.
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2211/fc/
Ioyw6ijmOiljLSMlPVwdo6BufFLbf1
alQK1VUhX4foddpbw32m6dFq/?count=1234567890
