Cheerskep: I wouldn't argue the significance of any of the authors in your list. I do quibble with the designation "popular". William has previously referred to the proportion of the population which was literate in the past. If only monks can read, I question whether there would be a popular literature of the time. Further, I wonder if there was a "Peyton Place" of say, 1713: literature which was read by many but has not remained as part of any canon as it hasn't been respected by scholars or critics.
Geoff C

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: The Long Life of popular art?
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:24:34 EST

In a message dated 11/4/08 10:41:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


> Popular fiction from the 19th C. -- but anything earlier than 1800 ?
>
Lots -- Swift, Defoe, Fielding, Richardson, Sterne, Andrews, Smollett,
Burney, Radcliffe, Voltaire, Rousseau, deLaclos, Prevost, et al. Still earlier:
Cervantes, Rabelais.



**************
Plan your next getaway with AOL Travel.  Check out Today's Hot
5 Travel Deals!
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212416248x1200771803/aol?redir=http://travel.aol.com/discount-travel?ncid=emlcntustrav00000001)

Reply via email to