Re: Reading Shaw : Chapter 2

[William Conger]

Thanks.  Now why is anyone looking at that Shaw?  At all.  If Lehrer is 
mediocre (and I don't think he is) although I agree he is "popular", this guy 
is a relic from some Reader's Digest or Coronet magazine of long ago. Just too 
awful to even mention.  Below us.
WC


--- On Wed, 12/17/08, cheers...@aol.com <cheers...@aol.com> wrote:

> From: cheers...@aol.com <cheers...@aol.com>
> Subject: Re: Reading Shaw : Chapter 2
> To: aesthetics-l@mh.databack.com
> Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2008, 8:21 PM
> In a message dated 12/17/08 9:18:05 PM,
> w-con...@sbcglobal.net writes:
> 
> 
> > Just for one week, could you find some synonyms for
> fuzzy and muddled? 
> > Those words are so worn out here they make me sick,
> like too much
> chocolate.
> >
> Understood, and I shall do so. In a moment of bad judgment,
> I put them in for
> old time's sake.
> 
> 
> 
> **************
> One site keeps you connected to all your email: AOL Mail,
> Gmail, and Yahoo Mail. Try it now.
> (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&amp;
> icid=aolcom40vanity&amp;ncid=emlcntaolcom00000025)