Perfect.
In the case of Wagner, it is interesting to read the texts of the operas and 
replace them in the context. Actually it seems to me that there is a difference 
between the lyrics and the music. I mean, is it really the same guy who wrote 
the famous chord in Tristan & Isold, and hated jews, foreigners etc... Well, 
that is another topic, I guess. 
Cheers
Luc


 www.lucdelannoy.com




----- Original Message ----
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 6:16:18 PM
Subject: Re: Heidegger: truth and art

We can challenge anybody for ever. There are no absolute answers for
anything. Heidegger had an important question to play with: origin of art, it
is not the same, in my understanding, as 'what is  art'. I think that he
answered that as well as anybody: art is the road to discovery of reality
through  manipulation of sensible material(techne). Degree of creativity in
this manipulation, thanks to the representation of objects (shoes, temples and
so on) as symbols plus metaphors separates fine art from craft, though both
are 'techne' based.
When I deal with art or philosophy I don't care of some prejudices   of the
person ( Wagner) if I don't detect the agenda in the logic or beauty of the
particular work. In this instance I don't detect it, and I am prone to be very
sensitive to propaganda.
Boris Shoshensky
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Heidegger: truth and art
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:35:52 GMT

Saul wrote:

>"It is not the explanation that reveals the essence it is the work that art
does - the essence is objective - our interpretation of it is subjective"

Then there is no need for art criticism, and no need to read an essay about
the "origin of the work of art", Those who "love understanding" works of art
should just be looking at them.

Although, immediately Saul  backs off from the above assertion, and suggests
that our response (including certain explanations, no?) are
"part of its revealing".

(try Googling the phrase "double talk")


If Heidegger's essays are considered as poetry, and every "is" can be
replaced
by "seems to me" -- then  I suppose this poem does present a
certain way of being in the world -- nothing like mine -- but interesting for
its rhythms of  circular thinking and the dark, romantic undertones shared by
national socialism.

When he concludes that art has been dying for several centuries -- for him,
it
has been (and judging from how he writes  about Van Gogh, art is as dead as a
pair of muddy old shoes.)

Boris's response is best:  i.e. to celebrate Heidegger's  "elegant
sophisticated dialectic manner", and not to challenge him with any questions.

____________________________________________________________
Click to compare life insurance rates.  Great rates, quick and easy.
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/BLSrjpYVvB5Qpe0MWK9kHLwGVhCAA0
W3clv6t3BryV1Bl21N1irkAg8TH4s/

Reply via email to