QUE VIVAN LOS "PRESERVERS" ! (Mando) Quite so! This is the part of Heidegger that I would like to quote -- including the following:
"The Preservers of a work belong to its createdness with an essentially equal to that of the creator" Artists of our era are happy to have the "preservers" pay them and celebrate their work -- but recognize their role as "essentially equal" to that of the artist ? No way - though come to think of it - in most eras, the "preservers" were aristocrats who called the tune , while those whom we now recognize as great artists were just tradesmen who played the song. Unfortunately, Heidegger will conclude that "the origin of the work of art - that is the origin of both the creators and the preservers, is .... a distinctive way in which truth comes into being, that is, becomes historical" Which would invite historical argument to establish success in both roles, based on the question: "what is the truth of our time?" (as distinguished from those times that came before) That's why Heidegger is so important to a Marxist like Saul -- but why would William and Boris be so fond of him ? (both of whose work seem to belong to a time that came before) ____________________________________________________________ Give back to your community. Click here to start a new career as a Police officer. http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxQFcj6aFNbSOD1jL6Zs9wZD3 W8xf4TRa7DlqxneH10ZYQPbMIygkY/
