In a message dated 5/9/2009 12:15:11 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

Frances  to Luis with many thanks and many words... 
(1) It is agreed that drawn  drafts and scale models can be
preparatory to architecture, but not likely  always required; nor would 
drawings or carvings of buildings be  tectonic or
architectural in their own right on their own alone, if say  the
actual depicted product were never started, let alone completed
or  finished. It also seems that temporality and territoriality in
initializing  and finalizing an architectural product would be
irrelevant to the product  being tectonic or architectural. This
also raises a further point in regard  to fabrication or
construction and even utilization or occupation as to  whether the
architectural product upon being initialized need be  fully
settled and completed and finished to be finalized  as
architecture. In other words, could the tectonic  architectural
product as art or as nonart be started and settled and  deemed
finished or finalized and indeed realized, yet remain  incomplete
or even unfinished, as many pictures and sculptures indeed  are.
_______________________________________________________________
LF response - Yes, many projects remain incomplete, unintentionally and  
many times intentionally if the project is to be built in phases. Each phase 
is  a totality, a complete work of architecture, and each subsequent phase 
sums up  to a new totality. The use/function of the building may change. 
Additions  and remodelings often occur that either accentuate, propagate, 
contrast, or  change the original edifice's underlying architectural 
ideas/forms/functions.  Time and "acts of god" including war may destroy or 
deteriorate 
"the  architecture" - for example the Parthenon, one of the great icons of  
architecture. All of these instances remain architecture.
 
Say a residence, a work of architecture is completed, and the family moves  
in. Soon after there is an infestation of termites and they all have to 
move out  for two days to have the residence tented and fumigated. Is it no 
longer  architecture during these two days? Now expand the time frame, they 
never  return and no one lives there for decades or ever again. Is it no longer 
 architecture? 
It retains the inherent potency of architecture whether occupied or not,  
whether ever seen again or not. 
 
 
 
Luis Fontanills
 
Architect
Miami/Dade Counties, Florida



**************Recession-proof vacation ideas.  Find free things to do in 
the U.S. (http://travel.aol.co
m/travel-ideas/domestic/national-tourism-week?ncid=emlcntustrav00000002)

Reply via email to