Thing that forms that subjective view is objective quality. Boris Shoshensky
---------- Original Message ---------- From: armando baeza <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: armando baeza <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Architecture and Philosophy Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 07:39:50 -0700 The unavoidable aesthetic quality in anything will always remain a subjective quality no matter the judgement of so-called experts. 'El que tiene mas saliva,come mas Pinole" they use to say. I wish I could translate that phrase for you, but it refers to judgement. mando On May 9, 2009, at 4:33 AM, Frances Kelly wrote: > Frances to Armando with thanks... > Nonetheless, the objective quality and the subjective judgement > even together simultaneously would likely still be inadequate to > render the ordinary object sensed as automatically becoming art, > assuming that art is a lofty class now holding extraordinary > objects. The probe into possibly framing a define and theory of > architecture has seemingly exposed several preliminary issues to > address in preparation for that task; such as whether classes > like art and architecture are objective constructs standing alone > aside from mind, and if any ordinary object found or built for > somatic bodily use will thereby be held or deemed as architecture > merely due to this fact, and if an architectural object is > automatically art by simply being architecture, and if art should > be divided into several kinds of art to house at least several > kinds of architecture, and if the judgement called to art might > be either sensitive or cognitive or emotional or intellectual, or > even unnecessary and marginal. > > You wrote... > Yet, the unavoidable aesthetic quality has to exist, before > judgment. Which may be more important? ____________________________________________________________ Patio furniture that can last you a lifetime. Click Now. http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/BLSrjpYYIEdKAGRKWrlNJiJKvNqEVT zSoD0wsPktxBxJP0OKx4BkO8kRxzq/
