"The true function of the architect is to initiate such buildings as shall correspond to the real needs of the people" -- "the true work of the architect is to organize, integrate, and glorify utility" (Louis Sullivan, "Kindergarten Chats" - Chapter 42, "What is an Architect")
So, the design of a bank, for example, ought to "organize, integrate, and glorify" that specific use. But what is the use of a bank? In addition to housing a safe - doesn't a bank also have to attract customers ? Doesn't it have to inspire confidence regarding the future behavior of the banker (even if this is something of a joke, then , now , and forever) And what if people feel more confident in a bank that resembles a Roman temple? (actually -- the Roman public building, or basilica, could serve as a public office building, as well as a temple) My local bank (now called "Fifth Third" -- but it has changed ownership 4 times over the past 20 years) is basically a Roman basilica -- and it's spacious nave gives me much pleasure to pretend to be a noble Roman every time I wait in line for a teller. (my only complaint is with the weakness of the ornamental detail) This is where the architect, as poet/prophet must distinguish between the "the real needs of the people" and whatever the foolish mob might feel that it wants today. And this is also where Sullivan's philosophy of a democratic architecture (as well as his career) runs into serious trouble. (as we remember that his philosophy was being written as his career/life was at the beginning of it's long, relentless tailspin) ____________________________________________________________ Free quotes fast! Get competitive rates on homeowner insurance. Click Now. http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxUO1Vzd8RIw65B336J67RxAN OeUUPuZeehYgzKa6l0PJB09apFQFi/
