>i quite agree, that aesthetic immersion almost always brings out the good in the unrecognized.(Mando)
If there's anything good to be recognized. The most obvious example being the one-person show. Unlike works in the temporal arts (music, literature, dance etc), works of visual art must compete for attention with everything else in the room, and when everything else has been made by the same person., aesthetic immersion is almost unavoidable. Pieces always look better in a one-person show than they do when they are presented as lonely outposts surrounded by a blank, competing, or even hostile environment. Suddenly, pieces that might have been ignored, stand out as variations on the imaginative life of one person. That's why it's so sad that large retrospectives are so rare -- usually no more than a once-in-a-lifetime event even for very famous artists (unless you're able to travel around the world to wherever one is happening). And it's even sadder that, unless you're living in the wilderness or someplace like the islands of Venice, aesthetic immersion is usually immersion in drek -- a total, unrelenting bombardment by the banal, awkward, incomplete, obnoxious, garish, toxic, and petty. It's very important to be able to tune things completely in - or tune them completely out -- but this kind of thinking seems to be beneath the radar of neuroscience. ____________________________________________________________ Find solutions for your business. Click here and get it done now! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxUki9Lkgd8d5HTRDV5l8Ejc0 KLaP0mruvXaasVcYhy90RfAc1RzrC/
