"That's terrible" or "That's great" occur almost immediately upon seeing the work".
I agree on "That's terrible", but to say "That's great" is more complex process. Boris Shoshensky ---------- Original Message ---------- From: Michael Brady <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Changing my mind confabulation? Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:41:12 -0400 On Aug 31, 2009, at 8:14 AM, [email protected] wrote: > I do think that the ability to describe clearly and accurately the > feelings or sensations of seeing a painting are an integral part of > determining an aesthetic position or experience. Nah. The experience precedes the description, and thus is already determined by the time you get around to describing it. "That's terrible" or "That's great" occur almost immediately upon seeing the work. The description is post-hoc and entirely linear in time, whereas the experience of a painting is simultaneous and instantly polyvalent. The difficulty--and thus the potential achievement--of describing the experience is in retaining those "poly" parts of the experience as you march the words one by one through your head and onto the paper or screen. That, btw, is something I admire in a writer's talent: holding on to the fleeting feeling as he or she slowly unreels the words. It's like keeping a volatile liqueur in your mouth to savor the aroma as long as possible. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Michael Brady [email protected] http://considerthepreposition.blogspot.com/ Subscribe: [email protected] Unsubscribe: [email protected] ____________________________________________________________ Best Weight Loss Program - Click Here! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/BLSrjpYSwrFsyAF4JqVL67TAq6ad81 B1irD65s3BEpwxtSQqvtFyfzk2yNi/
