Apparently, Mando, you go to exhibitions of contemporary art even less often that I do, because large scale photography is very big right now.
If the photo you showed had included some anomaly, subtle enough to flatter the viewer who finds it, but sufficient to undermine the apparent celebration, it would have qualified as high brow museum art, and Mr. Ostrow might even write a review of it. Though regarding photography, you and I are almost on the same page. I would never say that the camera is incapable of presenting an interpretation, but it is "cold blooded" -- i.e. it presents forms that are as dead as the sculptures in a wax museum -- no -- they're even more dead than that, and people who don't feel that way haven't learned how to feel paintings, so they don't know what they're missing. Regretfully, Rand was probably just such an insensitive person. How else could she disparage Rembrandt for painting a side of beef. (page 166) ____________________________________________________________ Need cash? Click to get an emergency loan, bad credit ok http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxQ2XHQ7VUWoaeokukWBzKm16 WP6EoQ7PlpnnGFnvMxxZidwDst3jy/
