>If one becomes a curator, the work invariably reflects the one's personal taste. The expertise quality only means that the choices they may make are broader between two aesthetically subjective points, what do you think? (Mando)
"Broader" is one issue, and it's an important one. (though it's also difficult, since "broadness" cannot be all inclusive) But youbre forgetting how concerned youbve been about the difference between b chicken and rabbitb Isnbt the ability to make that distinction one criterion of expertise that is very important to you? Another might be experience. Could a person who has never been to an art museum possibly qualify as an art expert? Or a person who could not tell sort paintings by the century in which they were made? Youbve conflated expertise with unanimity of opinion, and that doesnbt happen even in the sciences. So you won't allow that one subjective opinion might be better than another, and you've ended up with Michael, despairing of the entire project of vetting experts, which admittedly is complex and difficult. But if you like to see other peoplebs art (possibly you donbt?), youbve got be concerned with who is screening what will be available for you, and the rest of the public, to see. Therebs something defeatist about an artist who doesnbt care about that, and I canbt believe you felt that way when you were beginning your studies. ____________________________________________________________ Weight Loss Program Best Weight Loss Program - Click Here! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/c?cp=Am77YyqjNBH8AizhveD_yQAAJz6c l_zTaptgNR5c8Mer1v9kAAYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEUgAAAAA=
