If you would like to go back and respond to my posts about Kivy, now, Cheerskep, please do so!
Apparently, you have much more free time now -- and I am certainly willing to go back and reconsider those issues. But you won't do it, will you? Because it's not just the specifics of whatever Kivy or Berger or Smith have written -- it's the fact that they have attempted to write any expository prose at all -- all which the radical nominalist in you finds unbearably stupid/muddled/etc. (the only exception appears to be the expository prose in "how to" books -- like the one you once wrote) > Here's a surprise, Chris: I explicitly suggested Kivy's PHILOSOPHIES OF ARTS long before you (commendably) talked the forum into reading it. It was a genuine disappointment to me that I was occupied off-forum when the group was going through that book, imperfect though it is. ____________________________________________________________ Nutrition Improve your career health. Click now to study nutrition! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/c?cp=0B4j9lGHIZQ9514c1dZK-wAAJz6c l_zTaptgNR5c8Mer1v9kAAYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASQwAAAAA=
