But there are different kinds of erasure,one whose purpose is to remove a mark wilfully,resulting in a blank completely replaced by a differrent mark and no trace of the erasure,one whose purpose is to diffuse a mark with possibly anothr mark written over it so that the erasure shows along with the diffusion of the underlieing mark-and the accidental erasure,outside of wilfull action,which is what this sentence refers to. It seems sensible. Kate Sullivan In a message dated 3/15/10 9:36:20 AM, [email protected] writes:
> What of the mark of erasure- which is often over-written > > > On 3/14/10 8:10 PM, "Michael Brady" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 14, 2010, at 9:07 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > > A good mark must be durable in itself and not easy to remove either > accidentally or wilfully.
