Art as an aesthetic objectification of experience, to a certain degree,
sounds good to me. Another way to objectify experience, to a certain
degree, is science, with some aesthetic component as a collateral effect.
Boris Shoshensky

---------- Original Message ----------
From: "Mike Mallory" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: "Indifference to the aesthetic will in the long run lessen    the
economic product [whereas] attention to the aesthetic will    increase
economic  welfare." Josiah Stamp
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 14:27:25 -0700

I have suggested that aesthetics objectifies experience, which facilitates
commodification.  I did not mean that aesthetics turns experience into a
material object.  Rather, to answer Kate's question, aesthetics is a process
whereby a piece of the endless flowing stream of experience is segregated
and separated out.  A simple or complex unit of experience becomes "framed"
by the artifact.  This results in a conceptual object.

Furthermore, I'm only saying that the process can happen this way.  Artwork
representing experience previously reduced to a conceptual object is more
appropriately viewed as  editing, rather than create, a conceptual object.



Mike Mallory

_____________________________________________
From: "Saul Ostrow" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: "Indifference to the aesthetic will in the long run lessen the
economic product [whereas] attention to the aesthetic will increase economic
welfare." Josiah Stamp


> Commodification needs no material object - it is  the fetishization of
> objectification  - in that the objectified experience is of greater
> exchange
> value than it does use value - the very process in itself is one of
> anaesthetization
 &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&


Doesn't it also involve a lexical shift, in that things are described so
that their social meanings are
changed from what was previously not acceptable as an aesthetic perception
to being acceptable?  Also what is the objectification of experience?
Kate Sullivan

Reply via email to