On Jun 8, 2012, at 10:05 PM, caldwell-brobeck wrote:

> But on what basis can one say it doesn't address art issues? I can
> think off hand of at least one -sort of an ironic poke at the other
> pieces mentionned.


Sort of a banal-retentive approach to thinking about or producing artworks?
<g>



| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Michael Brady

Reply via email to